Categories
Law

-no sources are needed

-The Statement is a maximum of 8,000 characters.
-I wanted my personal statement theme to revolve around “being the product of my environment”. How it impacted my mindset growing up but realizing that it’s not ultimately true because decisions also affect one’s path.
-I attached a very rough publish of all my thoughts but they are a bit jumbled, I have a hard time making it coherent, easy, and interesting to read.
-No sources are needed
-The requirements of the Personal Statement are outlined in grey at the top of the attachment
– Tried to emphasize the impact my parents had on influencing me to take pre-med, even though I was dispassionate I was still a bit interested but in another aspect, that’s what allowed me to become interested in Health Law and why I want to pursue it.

Categories
Law

Understand the use and effect of nonverbal communication in law enforcement.

Understand the use and effect of nonverbal communication in law enforcement. Understand where (agency), when and why decoding nonverbal communication is important in L.E..

Categories
Law

Cite tatum specifically and interpret her work.

Having read “Defining Racism, Can we Talk?”, please discuss how Tatum’s work on Defining Racism, is related to this current news story on Book Banning. You will want to do the following:
Cite Tatum specifically and interpret her work. When Tatum argues about the advantages and disadvantages of positions in society (75), she …. and be clear on the parts you discuss and relate it to the story on book banning.
Watch the news story at least twice, writing out some of the points of the different students, the author, parents and what they say or do specifically relate to Tatum’s work.
Reflect with your thoughts on Tatum’s Reading along with the news story. You are to show me your clear understanding with organized thoughts on Tatum’s work as it relates to this story specifically, along with your reflection. This should be at least 3 paragraphs long.
Here is the link:
https://www.cbsnews.com/video/more-us-schools-see-an-uptick-in-book-banning/#x

Categories
Law

If so, how and why?

Instructions: Winne and Ralph have concerns about the Statute of Frauds and electronic contracts. To respond to their concerns, you must address the following questions: A. Discuss whether the contract between Company X and Windows Bright is subject to the requirements of the Uniform Commercial Code Statute of Frauds. B. Analyze and explain whether the electronic internet contract between Company X and Windows Bright satisfies the “writing” requirements for the Statute of Frauds? If so, how and why? Number each section as: A. B. TEMPLATE IS PROVIDED IN ATTACHEMENTS AS WELL AS SOURCES TO USE. General Background: The Viral Clean (“Clean”) owners have questions and need clarification about several contract concepts and issues related to their new business. Specifically, they have questions about: the Statute of Frauds “writing requirement” and electronic contracts Clean will be selling products via the internet, and the owners wonder whether these electronic contracts are valid and enforceable. TLG discusses the following case with the owners to explain the Statute of Frauds. Background Facts You Need To Know: Company X, a company in Illinois, contracted via the internet with Windows Bright, a small window washing business in Missouri, to purchase four cases of Shiny Lite window cleaning solution at $200 per case. Company X paid via the internet with a company credit card, and an electronic contract was created. The electronic contract stated that the four cases of Shiny Lite would be shipped to Company X’s place of business in Illinois via UPS. Once UPS delivered the Shiny Lite, the contract required Windows Bright to clean Company X’s windows.

Categories
Law

The separate opinions and dissents should only be considered (if relevant or of particular interest) in the analytical section.

AGLC4 referencing style Write a critical review of the following two cases based on their similarities and differences: Case 1: IMM v R (2016) 257 CLR 300 (analyse only the judgment by French CJ, Kiefel, Bell, and Keane JJ) File : IMM v The Queen (2016)_257_CLR_300.pdf Download IMM v The Queen (2016)_257_CLR_300.pdf AND Case 2: R v Bauer (a pseudonym) (2018) 266 CLR 56 File : R v Bauer (a pseudonym) (2018)_266_CLR_56-1.pdf Download R v Bauer (a pseudonym) (2018)_266_CLR_56-1.pdf The essay should include three parts: two case note sections (roughly 500 words each) and a comparison section (roughly 500 words). Each note should include: An introduction A brief summary of relevant facts The questions addressed by the courts The legal principles enunciated in the cases (including rationes decidendi) The courts’ decisions (including any separate judgments or dissenting opinions) The third section highlights the research component of this assignment. In this section, you need to go beyond the two cases on which the assignment is based. Your research could include, for example, other cases and peer reviewed journal articles. Whatever resources you use, they should zero in on the evidence issues raised by the two cases. This section should also include: Your analyses of the courts’ decisions and conclusions in the two cases, and How the decisions/principles compare or contrast between the cases. You will be expected to use other authorities, including cases, outside the two given cases. Further Guidance Introduction: As with legal academic essays, the introduction of a case note should be short and functional. The introduction orients the reader to the issues raised by the case, the court’s reasoning and the author’s opinion of the decision. Summary: this should be succinct and should not attempt to set out in extensive detail every separate opinion or dissent. The separate opinions and dissents should only be considered (if relevant or of particular interest) in the analytical section. You must save the majority of words for your analysis. Analysis: This section should form by far the largest part of your case note and is where the most marks are allocated. Here, you are evaluating the court’s reasoning. As part of that evaluation, you may wish to consider whether significant factors, principles or approaches were overlooked or undervalued; whether some sources of international law or rules were given due consideration or distinguished appropriately; whether the court’s conclusions were justified by its reasoning. You may also wish to identify significant implications of the case that go beyond the specific effects of the judgement. For instance, did the court adopt a particular approach to the interpretation of the law? Was this in keeping with previous cases? Is this significant? Such an evaluation goes beyond the narrow scope of the litigation, whilst bearing in mind that court decisions are, as you know, binding on lower courts. Conclusion: this should be brief and succinct, summarising your opinion and reasoning in relation to the case. You should introduce any new material at this point of the paper. Detailed Criteria for Assessment of Assignment Thought, Content, Argument and Analysis • Demonstrates understanding of key materials and concepts related to the selected topic. • Develops arguments or ideas logically and persuasively • Supports arguments/ideas with evidence and reasons • Critical analysis of issues discussed • Originality Structure/Organisation • Organises material in a clear, logical manner to support ideas and/or argument(s) • Coherently linked ideas • Effective use of sections, paragraphing and/or headings Research Skills and Use of Source Materials • Uses an appropriate range of relevant sources, including sources beyond the required readings • Demonstrates close reading of source materials Expression and Presentation • Uses accurate grammar, spelling and punctuation • Communicates ideas clearly • Engagingly and effectively communicates understanding and argument • Acknowledges all sources appropriately • Accurate referencing/citation

Categories
Law

“this land” by dunbar ortiz

https://nycstandswithstandingrock.files.wordpress.com/2016/10/dunbar-ortiz-2014.pdf
“This Land” by Dunbar Ortiz

Categories
Law

Ted brown and jim green have been discussing going into business together for several months, and they are anxious to start that business before the end of this month.

Ted Brown and Jim Green have been discussing going into business together for several months, and they are anxious to start that business before the end of this month. However, both Ted Brown and Jim Green each have to be out of town for several weeks on other business, so Ted Brown has told his son, Theodore, who is 16, about the discussions with Jim Green and has appointed Theodore to complete negotiation of the final details of the business. Jim Green has told his son James, who is 18 years old, about the discussions with Ted Brown and appointed James to complete the negotiations. The business that Ted Brown and Jim Green want to create will develop an app for cell phones that will identify family-oriented attractions along major highways so families can download the app to help in planning family vacations. The development of the app will take 4 months, and then it will take approximately another 4 months to fully deploy the app. As the app becomes popular, the business will solicit family-oriented businesses to advertise on the app. Ted Brown and Jim Green have very little capital to use in the development and deployment of the app and will probably need to raise the capital necessary to develop and deploy a quality app. In your case study, address the questions below. Can Theodore Brown and James Green legally create the business that Ted Brown and Jim Green have been discussing? Why, or why not? If Theodore and James do create the business, what duties do they each owe their father? Describe what those duties mean in this case. What factors do Ted Brown and Jim Green (or their sons on their behalf) need to consider in selecting a form for this business? What form of business will provide the most advantage for their venture? What are the disadvantages of the form of business that they selected?

Categories
Law

350-500 word apa style essay with at least one citeable source on compare and contrast descriptive and analytic comparative research.

350-500 word APA style essay with at least one citeable source on Compare and contrast descriptive and analytic comparative research. Examine the benefits of historical research as well as the limitations inherent in using historical data, especially comparitive historical data

Categories
Law

Complete the worksheet answers by thoroughly answering all questions using full sentences unless the question asks for a list or a chart.

Instructions
Actively read the textbook chapters and review the website and document linked into the Learning Resources.
Complete the worksheet answers by thoroughly answering all questions using full sentences unless the question asks for a list or a chart.
Cite to your sources after each answer using the Bluebook citation form or MLA/APA, including the page number (Ex. 16) where you found your answer.
• First time citing in an assignment: Sean Melvin, David Orozco, F.E. Guerre-Pujol, Business Law and Strategy 16 (McGraw Hill 2021).
• Then use the short form Melvin at 16.
Questions
Chapter 4: The American Judicial System, Jurisdiction, and Venue
1. Summarize the differences between state and federal courts.
2. Identify the party or parties bringing a lawsuit and defending a lawsuit.
3. Briefly describe the role of each level of the federal court system: (1) District Courts; (2) Courts of Appeal (United States Circuit Courts); and (3) the United States Supreme Court.
4. Research the current members of the United States Supreme Court identify the justices by name. (See link to the Supreme Court website in the module Learning Resources page).
5. Briefly describe the differences (at least two) between trial courts and appellate courts.
6. Explain the two main types of jurisdiction required before a court hears a case: (1) personal jurisdiction and (2) subject matter jurisdiction. (Note: See lecture for “in rem” jurisdiction)
7. Describe the two main avenues of federal jurisdiction under Article III of the United States Constitution: (1) Federal Diversity Jurisdiction; and (3) Federal Question Jurisdiction.
8. Explain how a state court has the authority to hear a case over an out-of-state defendant.
9. Briefly describe the “minimum contacts” application found in the court case of Zippo Manufacturing Company v. Zippo Dot Com, Inc., 952 F. Supp. 1119 (W.D. Pa. 1997).
Chapter 5: Resolving Disputes: Litigation and Alternative Dispute Resolution
10. Describe the importance of planning for civil litigation from a business perspective.
11. Identify and briefly describe the three requirements for a plaintiff to have standing to sue.
12. Briefly describe the roles of a “complaint” and an “answer” in civil litigation.
13. Identify one type of “motion” and briefly describe its purpose.
14. Identify and briefly describe the methods or tools of discovery.
15. Describe the three main methods of alternative dispute resolution.
16. Under the Federal Arbitration Act identify four grounds or scenarios that describe when courts may “set aside” an arbitrator’s award. What primary source of American law is this act?

Categories
Law

Organization and clarity, including a logical structure, clear flow of ideas, and correct grammar.

For the OpEd assignment, students must analyze, critique, or expand upon key points on humanitarian principles, accountability, evaluation, data, and or standards. Define/describe the issue you are writing about and why it matters. Take a clear stance on the issue at hand and defend it using the material from the course (See PDF) and using outside sources. Include at least 1-2 case studies/real-world examples related to the issue. Organization and clarity, including a logical structure, clear flow of ideas, and correct grammar. Please be concise and avoid jargon. The OpEd must not exceed 350-500 words (1.5-2 pages double-spaced, 12-point Times New Roman Font). Include citations using the citation format of your choice.